Unbelief IS a sin, Non-Biblicist

chestertonrules Says:

Dec 17, 2008 - It is clear if you are not blind to the word of God. You are very dogmatic, but your dogma is your own.

chestertonrules Says:

Dec 17, 2008 - You need to get a better translation! 6 The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain.

grasshopperjax Says:

Dec 17, 2008 - "Origen believed that this was a teaching of the apostles." He also questions Chrisy' deity. What THAT of the apostles, too?

chestertonrules Says:

Dec 17, 2008 - In Him [Jesus] you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead (Colossians 2:11-12). When were Jews circumcised?

chestertonrules Says:

Dec 17, 2008 - It is common for heretics and apostates like Jehovah's Witnesses and Muslims to misquote the early Church Fathers and to read their own post-biblical and heretical views back into the Patristic writings. One such Father that is often misquoted is Origen. Heretics and apostates often misquote Origen and define his use of terms in light of their own heretical views and then claim that Origen denied the essential Trinity and the eternal existence of the Son. Google: Origen's Christology

kamaujackson811 Says:

Dec 23, 2008 - It is 100% clear....if Christ died for ALL sins of ALL people, no one would be in hell. To be logically consistent, Arminians MUST be universalists.....unless, they say that Christ did not die for the sin of unbelief.

kamaujackson811 Says:

Dec 23, 2008 - Sorry....I didn't watch your entire video before I commented....my apologies.

grasshopperjax Says:

Dec 23, 2008 - "Sorry....I didn't watch your entire video before I commented....my apologies. " No worries. At least you watched the video.

dkan3 Says:

Dec 24, 2008 - no not true because scripture attests that the kosmos (greek) used in 1 john and in john 3:16 in the same tense is it is sufficient for the whol world. Whoever (of the kosmos) will receive Him will have eternal life. Salvation is sufficient for the whole world

kamaujackson811 Says:

Dec 25, 2008 - I agree that the atonement was 'sufficient' for the entire world....but to whom was it directed? Kosmos means several things throughout scripture; both the entire world and specific groups are referred to with the term. Question: Was the intention of Christ's atonement, God's plan for the atonement, to save all men?

Providential1611 Says:

Dec 26, 2008 - I appreciate all your hard work in refuting James White on the KJV issue, and Calvinism, BUT, you would do well to READ Shank's book. You need to UNDERSTAND the Arminian view. Repentance is godly SORROW, not just turning. Repentance is BROKENESS. Remember, faith without works is DEAD. Without holiness NO MAN WILL SEE THE LORD. Proof men have passed from death to life is that they love and obey the Lord. John said that if a man says he knows God but does not obey Him, he is a LIAR.

grasshopperjax Says:

Dec 28, 2008 - "Repentance is godly SORROW, not just turning. Repentance is BROKENESS. " How sorrowful was the woman at the well in John 4?

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 1, 2009 - Watching this video again made me realize just how hate you have for Calvinists. To compare one of the most evangelistic Calvinists of the 20th century to stupid Pentecostal pimp-preacher Kerney Thomas is a low blow. Even if you disagree that is not the way to disagree. Not very Christlike, sir.

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 1, 2009 - "Even if you disagree that is not the way to disagree. Not very Christlike, sir. " Was it Christ-like for Arthur W. Pink to compare people like us to Romanists for our Biblical belief in man's free will? Was it Christ-like for James White to mock Calciumboy the way he did? And did Louis Ruggerrio really cuss you out (use profane language,) or did you bear false witness against him, which is VERY UNChristlike?

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - Well, calling me a little punk, when I ain't little and ain't a punk, at least to my somewhat courteous character, is cussing me out. Profanity and personal insults in my book are just as bad - be it Calvinist or non-Calvinist... Oh, and thanks for calling me a liar, Jax - much appreciated. I'm gonna cry like the "little punk" I am.

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - "Well, calling me a little punk, when I ain't little and ain't a punk, at least to my somewhat courteous character, is cussing me out. " My friend, that is slander. Cussing is PROFANE language. Calling you a little punk, well, when you accuse a man of something he didn't do, then yeah, that makes you a punk. Punk is NOT a cuss word. Whether it hurt your ego is another issue, but that is not cussing my friend, and that kind of false witness can damage a person's testimony.

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - "Profanity and personal insults in my book are just as bad - be it Calvinist or non-Calvinist..." I agree, insults are bad, but you indeed are acting like a little punk by accusing a man of cussing at you, WHEN HE DIDN'T. THAT is FALSE WITNESS.

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - Wait a minute, who even told you this story? He called me a punk after I called him out to debate in a video on my channel. I hadn't done anything to him before that... Sir, you're older than me so I will try to restrain my tongue but where in the world did you get this information from?

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - "Sir, you're older than me so I will try to restrain my tongue but where in the world did you get this information from? " In your "calvinism promo" video when you commented in your own section. The quote is now deleted as I see you have now deleted it from the comment section.

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - And what did this mythological comment say? I haven't the time, energy or the death wish frankey, to lie about Ruggerio. I hang around on PalTalk and I know what it is like when he's upset with you. Life is hard enough without cussing a man like Ruggerio...

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - Youngcalvinist08, let me clarify. I apologize, it was NOT the Calvinism promo videoyou made thecomment on, it was the Mr' Ruggerio video you did where you said this: "Bro, so far he's cussed me out and turned my challenge down, so ANOTHER video is in the works to get his attention. " So you did not delete the comment. For that I apologize, but it was still a wrong statement to make, slanderous and without merit.

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - So he was justified in calling me a little punk for no good reason? Oh and he did turn my challenge down when he messaged me on PalTalk so I don't see where I made a false statement. An insult is an insult, whether profane language is used or not.

grasshopperjax Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - "So he was justified in calling me a little punk for no good reason? " I don't know what you said to him that made him call you that. I do know from my discussion with you so far that you pride yourself untouchable. You accused Mr. Rugerriero of cussing at you, which he DID NOT as evidenced by your own words regarding what he REALLY said, and calling out a man for the sake of debate (which is NOT Christ-lile) is not Biblical. It's false witness, and it's not Christ-like.

YoungCalvinist08 Says:

Jan 2, 2009 - You know what, GJax, I don't care. I don't pride myself untouchable. I'm 18 - I'm very touchable, believe you me. I am not prideful, neither do I look down on anyone. Watch my video - he made a challenge and I took him up on it. No insults, no ad homs - just me fulfilling Mr. R's request. Call me a liar - in fact, for the sake of my sanity, please ban me from commenting on your channel. Just become I am a Calvinist doesn't make me a liar.

chestertonrules Says:

Jan 8, 2009 - You are a victim of lies.